![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Surabaya - Indonesia
Posts: 199
|
more pics
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
Very good restoration job!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,378
|
These three were found together in the same place?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,914
|
Very interesting how there is a vestigeal mendak fused to the pesi, but there are are no traces of vestigeal hilts... just to mention one of the things I find suspicious.
To me these blades have been artificially aged. ![]() But maybe I am too paranoid.
Last edited by mariusgmioc; 13th April 2017 at 06:50 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,263
|
Quote:
![]() That doesn't remove all suspicion from these pieces, but i cannot see the lack of any remains of the hilt as cause for that suspicion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,914
|
Quote:
![]() However, it is rather difficult to judge without having them in the hand... and enen then it may be hard to tell for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
Old or artificially aged? This type of blade is a typical dilemma for the collectors and they are not sold cheap. Personally I would vote for artificially aged as the corrosion is quite uniform but would like to hear Alan's opinion.
If I am correct, the maker did his best to lure us (square pesi, metuk, blade shape, ricikan, etc). Regards |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|