![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Southeast Florida, USA
Posts: 436
|
![]()
For comparison this Patilla style miquelet lock is by Armanguer, a gun-lock maker who worked in Ripoll circa 1675
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
In this case the half and full cock sears working in a different order position, right ?
BTW, is this one yours ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Southeast Florida, USA
Posts: 436
|
![]() Quote:
That is right fernando. In the case of the lock by Armanguer, the half-cock sear is below the full-cock sear. For your Gomes lock it is above and doesn't engage the toe. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
|
![]()
Hello everyone
Although a bit redundant and obvious, I upload a scheme of the rake bridle in the miquelete. It is an insert, independent of the bowl, and I have drawn two methods of fixing to the platinum. The false bridle is placed on its flare and comes to be retained by the frizen screw. In the three primitive miquelete specimens photographed by LAVIN (pages 156, 173, 174) the method of sjecion can be clearly seen. Who has not had a copy in the hands, and is guided only by the photographs, can be confused, and think that is part of the bowl. Below is the outline of a French bowl, with the bridle forming part of the piece. Affectionately. Fernando K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Southeast Florida, USA
Posts: 436
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
|
![]()
Miquelete
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
|
![]()
Hello
Sorry everyone, but I do not have a scanner, and I was fighting with photoshop because the attachments have a limit affectionately. Fernando K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|