OTTOMAN GUNSTOCK MYSTERY

Pukka Bundook · 3rd January 2016, 05:27 PM

Rick,

I am sure these were to be used as a cheek -stock.
supported between the arms and not against the shoulder.
Many Senegalese stocks, like the Japanese, are short as well.
(Also the European arms many were copied from were also cheek -stocked)

As some of these better decorated arms are likely for sporting purposes, I don't think the rampart idea fits particularly well, but I could be wrong.

How does the piece in question align when held in this manner? (against cheek)

Richard.

rickystl · 3rd January 2016, 09:00 PM

Hi Richard.

Thanks for your response. I also thought about how some of the early European wheellock rifles, for sporting purposes, were also cheek-stocked.
I too, at this point, am convinced that these short butt stocks on the Ottoman guns were designed to be shot from the cheek. It seems like the most logical conclusion.
If you bring the short stock up to the cheek and aim the front and rear sights, it aligns perfectly. Since both of these guns are live shooters, I can attest that the cheek stock gun is actually a bit faster to aim and fire than the shoulder-stocked gun.
So it may have been that it was a simple matter of shooter's preference in building the gun stocks.
Rick.

Pukka Bundook · 4th January 2016, 04:12 PM

Rick,

Thanks for the answer to how they align.
Cheek -stocked target arms have been made since the matchlock, and in fact they Had to be fired in this manner to be eligible for certain matches.

Was the original bore rifled?

rickystl · 9th January 2016, 06:01 PM

Hi Richard.

The cheek stock gun was originally a smooth bore, and now has a new smooth bore liner. The shoulder stock gun was originally rifled, and now has a new rifled liner.
The cheek stock gun is a bit of an ugly duckling LOL It has a couple of period repairs from field use. Plus, while the barrel is an original, it was not original to this gun. The diameter is a bit large for the fore stock. That's why the barrel bands look a bit tall.
The shoulder stock gun was originally made with a slightly larger lock, and changed to a bit smaller lock - back in the period. The evidence is there if you remove the lock and view the mortice. But it was done very professionally back in the day.
So I thought these were good candadites to make into shooters.

Thanks again for everyones input.

Rick.

3rd January 2016, 09:00 PM	#2
rickystl Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: St. Louis, MO area. Posts: 1,633	Hi Richard. Thanks for your response. I also thought about how some of the early European wheellock rifles, for sporting purposes, were also cheek-stocked. I too, at this point, am convinced that these short butt stocks on the Ottoman guns were designed to be shot from the cheek. It seems like the most logical conclusion. If you bring the short stock up to the cheek and aim the front and rear sights, it aligns perfectly. Since both of these guns are live shooters, I can attest that the cheek stock gun is actually a bit faster to aim and fire than the shoulder-stocked gun. So it may have been that it was a simple matter of shooter's preference in building the gun stocks. Rick. Attached Images

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

3rd January 2016, 05:27 PM	#1
Pukka Bundook Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 803	Rick, I am sure these were to be used as a cheek -stock. supported between the arms and not against the shoulder. Many Senegalese stocks, like the Japanese, are short as well. (Also the European arms many were copied from were also cheek -stocked) As some of these better decorated arms are likely for sporting purposes, I don't think the rampart idea fits particularly well, but I could be wrong. How does the piece in question align when held in this manner? (against cheek) Richard.

4th January 2016, 04:12 PM	#3
Pukka Bundook Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 803	Rick, Thanks for the answer to how they align. Cheek -stocked target arms have been made since the matchlock, and in fact they Had to be fired in this manner to be eligible for certain matches. Was the original bore rifled?

9th January 2016, 06:01 PM	#4
rickystl Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: St. Louis, MO area. Posts: 1,633	Hi Richard. The cheek stock gun was originally a smooth bore, and now has a new smooth bore liner. The shoulder stock gun was originally rifled, and now has a new rifled liner. The cheek stock gun is a bit of an ugly duckling LOL It has a couple of period repairs from field use. Plus, while the barrel is an original, it was not original to this gun. The diameter is a bit large for the fore stock. That's why the barrel bands look a bit tall. The shoulder stock gun was originally made with a slightly larger lock, and changed to a bit smaller lock - back in the period. The evidence is there if you remove the lock and view the mortice. But it was done very professionally back in the day. So I thought these were good candadites to make into shooters. Thanks again for everyones input. Rick.