![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 524
|
![]() Quote:
The ca 1742 for the British example was verbatim from Gilkerson's book and possibly not meant as a model number. Also not described as having a cast grip. Thanks for the site mentioned reminder. I have that bookmarked http://www.vaabenhistoriskselskab.dk...a/ad_intro.php Here is a Swedish museum http://www.sfhm.se/templates/pages/A...epslanguage=EN Cheers GC |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,633
|
![]()
Hi Glen,
The '51' and '42' nomenclature is, as you know, rather ad hoc anyway and can be variable user to user. Thanks for the Swedish Museum website, not one I'd looked at before. To keep on the path of the Danes here is an entry from 'Lyles' 1982. My Regards, Norman. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|