![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,420
|
At this point I am hopelessly confused .
There is a mark on the quillon, but it is not a date ? There is a mark at the forte which is 1943 ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 317
|
Rick, The mark on the forte is for the year 1943, but not the quilion, they quilion just says year, next time I am out to I'll trying finding and looking at swords like yours to see if there was anything else on the quilion.
DOM in Persia, modern day Iran, to my knowledge it happened about the same time. Supposedly around the same time they changed the name from Persia to Iran (early 20th century), they change the yeah format as well. I could be wrong, since I have not read it in a book just have heard it from different sources. In Afghanistan the months are Arabic names of the Zodiac months, and in Iran they use the ancient Persian names. Today is the 14th day of Hoot (afg) Esfand (Ir) Pisces (Zd) in the year 1390, 14/12/1390 = 04/03/2012. Nawrooz (New year) is in 16 days
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,420
|
Ah, thanks very much AJ; understood now.
It's a bit surprising that swords were being manufactured in Afghanistan during that time with WW2 in full swing . |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
Quote:
Regards Ibrahiim al Balooshi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,289
|
So how do we determine which of the Hijri calendars are in play? I must say that from the looks of this sword i am having a hard time accepting the 1943 date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,340
|
I'd say regional. Countries who were historically/geographically closer to Persia have adopted it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 317
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
Quote:
Salaams ~ Might I suggest that it goes under Translations on the Sticky by Jim McDougall. Regards Ibrahiim al Balooshi. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Paris (FR*) Cairo (EG)
Posts: 1,142
|
Quote:
my translator is back ... but big argumentation about the mark on the "quillon"as far as, we didn't found a consensus, here our two interpretations may be that should give some tracks to our friend "AJ", specially about the digits that "I think" have read I leave to "AJ" to see with the "Solar calendar", if that could makes sense keep hope the words according if we take the sign ^ in consideration or not, should be a name - with ^ CHARD just a name (?) * - without ^ SARD just a name (?) * à + Dom * post correction/ - not "chard" but "SHAHD" - not "sard" but "SAHD" Last edited by Dom; 13th March 2012 at 11:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 317
|
DOM I really love your imagination and commitment it is good
But that tends to complicate things mostly, in the stamp we just have the word سنه (sana)(year) then there is the backwards ی symbolizing Hejri , then from bottom up there is what looks like a / the | that goes through سنه and what looks like the number 8 ۸. Now that latter 3 really just add to confusion and do not make and sense, one can't make any numbers out of them or anything. To me they are just flukes, I went and looked at some other swords of the same with the same stamp and those charactors were not present. The words suggested SHARD شرد (شارد) or SAHD سهد (ساهد( do not make anything. If I find a nice example of these I'll take a pic but for now, let's stop torturing Rick, I think he has alot of good info on the item Always looking forward to your colorful pics
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|