![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,263
|
i posted a copy of the US artillery manual for the civil war period on the forum before. it mentions bar and chain shot only in passing, for naval use. it goes into great detail on all other civil war era projectiles, their wooden sabot, the tin bands used to hold same to the shot, pre-made cartridges, etc. etc. worth doing a search for & reading it.
Linky to Gibbon Artillery Manual of 1863 the full 1862 army ordinance manual, scanned, is available thru google books as a .pdf if interested... it's too big to attach here. (19MB) it has sections not only on artillery, but small arms and horse saddles, and tackle, swords and bayonets, etc. and also tables on ballistics and on 'foreign' ordinance. Linky to google books ord. manual (click the .pdf item upper left to download) Last edited by kronckew; 17th November 2011 at 05:41 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
Hi Kronckew,
Those latter contributions seem to kind of lead to a considerably later period of time than I intended to cover when posting the thread and staking its claim. I have to admit though that I don't mind the current evolution at all, and I sure wish you to go on both researching and updating, guys! ![]() And don't worry: I promise you I'll hang on bringing in the earliest points of view on my favored subject! After all, all topics need evolution and fresh minds, just in order to stand up to scientific evaluation! I'm glad our community is taking the topic to further boundaries! ![]() Best, Michael Last edited by Matchlock; 17th November 2011 at 06:54 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
Hi there,
I found this barshot specimen attributed to the American Revolutionary War in a Cowans', Ohio, catalog of 28-29 April 2010. Best, Michael |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Quote:
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Hi Wayne
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,211
|
I have a huge appreciation for these naval types of shot and it was never my intention to steer attention away from the primary focus. I assure all that if I had my way, I'd own all the specimens already presented (
), nor do I have a particular interest in post- Age of Fighting Sail armament. It's just that it's so frustrating and amazing that there is an absence of clarity of this area pertaining to the 19th c. I was hoping to find out for sure and thus, I posted here. I feel anyone who researches specialty shot may find this thread informative from beginning to end (i.e. early shot to it's extinction in the latter half of the 19th century).Kronkew- thank you very much for those links. You bring my exact point to light with this, though. Here are manuals detailing every aspect of artillery from gunpowder grain, combustion forces, exact propulsion with estimation of droppage with firing, specific ordenance, the wood used to make cannon carriages, etc, etc. Yet, when it comes to our little friend, the bar and chain shot, there is a generic 4 or 5 word description. Understandably, these were on their way out, but still, no valid description for something still carried on ships and such? I just read an article on a land-based installation on the Atlantic coast that fired barshot at attacking ships circa 1860's, yet no pics, no descriptions? It's like this with every book and online source I've come across thus far. It's not just the Amer CW either. Other countries still carried forms of bar/chain shot. Were these just recycled from previous centuries, or is my guess right that with modern forging came easier models of barshot (two cannon balls braised to a round bar). That'ss my tirade for the night, just wish someone would definitively prove me right or wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,211
|
Hmmm...another clue to look into if it's correct.
http://cwbullet.org/bullet-relic-for...hp/t-6189.html |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|