![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 608
|
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for chiming in. One point of curiosity - the blade appears older than the fittings, and shows signs of use (not grandchild "abuse," mind you, but use)... Was it common to re-mount older blades as was commonly done with some keris? Also, if it had been made as a gift to present to the admiral, wouldn't one expect to see a commemorative inscription of some sort? Regards, Chris ETA a photo of the blade tip below:
Last edited by laEspadaAncha; 11th March 2011 at 06:50 PM. Reason: ETA Photo |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
Hi Chris. Always difficult to determine when/how such damage as you highlight above appeared. Given that the nicks and dings are at the approximate center of percussion (where one would expect a skilled swordsman to be placing cuts), they may well be caused by combat or training.
The only edge damage I've really ever been comfortable attributing to edge parrying or combat has been on a few swords with obvious repairs, where I could literally see tiny hammer marks, etc. Otherwise, who knows what fiend (grandchild? ) played Dragon Slayer in the backyard...And, yes, I have seen fine older blades of this type remounted. The general shape of that blade is consistant with later Thai swords, but the obvious laminate construction may well indicate it is older than the mounts, as *most* later blades I've handled are not laminated. Inscriptions? Sometimes. Andrew |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|