|
13th March 2008, 08:03 AM
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,727
|
Manolo,
I think I and Zifir might have been looking at the date before the clean picture. After you posted the better picture, I am more inclined to think it is a 9 rather than a 6. Which unless tha date helps you attribute the piece to a historical figure or an event, is not so important, and it is in all cases a nice early 19th century piece. Regards, Teodor |
|
|
|
|
Threaded Mode