![]() |
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
Fernando,
Yes, i can agree to Jim's suggestion - although I would say late 18th, or maybe early 19th century. It would help if you could provide a close up of the blade where it shows something blank, as I am not quite sure waht it is. Nice tulwar anyway, and one of the few, which can be pin pointed .Jens |
|
|
|
|
|