A 19th century Afghan warrior’s opinion on European blades compared to his own

Jim McDougall · 11th October 2025, 07:09 AM

I think the references to brittle blades from India likely referred to wootz, which if improperly forged was indeed brittle. While many of the wootz blades were of course beautifully finished and impressive for the weapons of those of status, these were not necessarily used in combat.

Great entry Chris! nice example, and as discussed, the British M1796 light cavalry sabre blades were highly favored by Indian warriors, with notable use by Sikhs, but that extended to others as well. This example had had the blade considerably reduced, with very nice hilt likely for ranking figure.

11th October 2025, 07:09 AM	#8
Jim McDougall Arms Historian Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Route 66 Posts: 10,722	I think the references to brittle blades from India likely referred to wootz, which if improperly forged was indeed brittle. While many of the wootz blades were of course beautifully finished and impressive for the weapons of those of status, these were not necessarily used in combat. Great entry Chris! nice example, and as discussed, the British M1796 light cavalry sabre blades were highly favored by Indian warriors, with notable use by Sikhs, but that extended to others as well. This example had had the blade considerably reduced, with very nice hilt likely for ranking figure.