![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Alan,
Glad we finally came to full understanding. My French sucks. But English, in its meticulously- precise way, gives “ re” an interesting twist. Linguistically it is likely incorrect, but it raises the meaning couple of notches up. This was not my invention: I have seen it in several classy publications and liked it immensely. Thanks for your comments and questions.They were very useful for clarifying what I wanted to say. Your critique made my position more understandable. Socratic method still rules! :-) |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|