|
26th August 2020, 10:23 AM
|
#35 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
Thank you Alan and I am glad that you could confirm my opinion with some certainty. It is a pity that the blade was damaged, it mat be younger than the 17th Century although it has kept the original features of these blades brought to Europe at that time. I am personally amazed by the quality of the pamor pattern and carving of the ricikan considering the presumed age of this piece.
Regards |
|
|
|
|
Threaded Mode