|  | 
|  3rd August 2016, 03:04 AM | #8 | 
| Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Ann Arbor, MI 
					Posts: 5,503
				 |   
			
			Gavin, From the very beginning I mentioned that "Bukhara" was a convenient general term in this case, and that the scabbard with eyelets was quite Afghani. I know about hilt repair. Doesn't bother me very much. One needs to remember that current designations of Uzbekistan, Tajikistan , Afghanistan etc, meant nothing in the 19 century. It is just "Central Asia", Khanates pattern, might have been made south of Panj River. The entire North Afghanistan is a Tajik/ Uzbek territory anyway, Remember Northern Alliance? As you have said it is a fighting sword , with repairs and a very old scabbard made for this blade. I do not care very much about how lavish, pretty and intact they are, I like mine to be of a " sergeant" grade at the most, with a whiff of stale blood:-) In short, - weapons, not "museum grade" wall decorations. This one Is right up my alley:-) | 
|   |   | 
| 
 | 
 |