![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,717
|
![]() Quote:
I'm still interested in the sayfs with genuine trade blades that I've linked before, previously you discounted them as Omani based only on the blades, but is there a way to distinguish the hilts regionally? Perhaps I misunderstood you previous comments on them but it seemed you were saying they couldn't be Omani not based on the hilts, but because the blades were stiff. I'm still not convinced the stiff blades weren't in use in Oman. As you said, the old short sword has a stiff blade, so there's no reason an Omani would object to a stiff European blade... Basically it seems to me the most logical answer is that the flexible blades are designed to fit the dance (which is not to say they still wouldn't deliver a nasty cut, I'm sure they do!) and were adapted from European trade blades already present in the region. From the quotes you included in your last post it would seem these local flexible blades would have been in use by the early 1800s. I think that's the most that can be said from the available data. Probably we are never going to agree entirely but I think we are getting closer. ![]() There is no need to look for a flexible Omani specific trade blade probably. Cheers, Iain Last edited by Iain; 10th January 2012 at 07:14 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|