![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,020
|
Could this be considered a Kard?
I leaning towards copper on the scabbard, a magnet failed to adhere to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
My wild guess would be India, late 19 century. May be even later composite.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,345
|
Ariel I think that is reasonable for now.
And the scabbard could also be brass or bronze. I do think the hilt is very recent. Again I'm with Ariel so far on it being a composite with Indian parts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,020
|
Ariel & Jose, thanks for the assessments.
Jose, how recent would you say the hilt is? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,912
|
I agree with the Indian origin but I believe that, it is not older than 20 century. From what I see, the blade appeart to be a modern attempt to replicate wootz.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
Ok i'll play with you too.
Old blade end of 19th c. and wootz Scabbard 20th c. early tourist object 1900. Hilt late 20th. c. All from India.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,020
|
Marius & Kubur, thanks for sharing your opinions on this knife.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|