![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 932
|
Good day dear members,
I will soon receive this nice old and strange sword, a parang latok if i'm right. It was described as a dayak sword but it’s not a mandau. The blade seems laminated, Will it match with olds models ... 1800 ?? I will post other/better pics when I get it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,431
|
Nice sword!
The blade tip is unusual for a latok! See the pic. taken from Amuk Murugul.Regards, Detlef |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,378
|
Has anyone tried cutting with one of these swords in the style that Xasterix uses?
On first look they seem like they would be unwiedly to use as a combat weapon, especially if used single handed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,537
|
It would be helpful to see a picture of the whole sword, but the evidence so far suggests this is a parang latok. Van Zonneveld says that the hilts on these are almost always wooden, but I have an example that has a bone hilt too. Fran, yours is only the second one I have seen with a bone hilt, and the hilt mounted in this fashion.
Regards, Ian. P.S. I found a thread where my example was discussed on the forum previously. There is some mention of a similar weapon used by the Land Dyaks called a buko. Also discussed inn that thread were soe characteristics that help distinguish between a parang latok (Sea Dyak) from buko (Land Dyak). Hope this is helpful to thinking about the sword posted above. Last edited by Ian; Today at 05:05 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|