![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Aug 2008 
				
				
				
					Posts: 264
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Wow I didn't think a barong could command this price($1990). I believe the former owner is also a member here...sorry for posting up your auction, I just think thats awesome. Not awesome that I can not afford one now, but awesome that these weapons are finally getting recognized as high quality fine pieces of art and people are willing to pay for it.  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	  http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=380107815400  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Oct 2008 
				Location: between work and sleep 
				
				
					Posts: 731
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Well I guess it means it is growing to be a highly appreciated object (which is good), which also means fewer and fewer people can see, hold, and appreciate them as they get expensive (which is not so good). European, Chinese, Japanese, Indian, and now Moro articfacts are getting expensive. Oftentimes African artifacts are not as much, and there is also less hype about them. A Fijian warclub will probably sell for more than a Zulu knobkerrie or an Iroquois ball-headed warclub.  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	So it has it's good and bad, the higher number of cheap antiques there are, the more people can appreciate them (but also more will "ruin" them). The more expensive these antiques are... then they are more likely to end up in museums or the large private collections of those who can afford them. That means they'll be appreciated and cared for... but means most people won't ever have the same pleasure. I don't know what's better... do you?   What's the point of keeping a nation's heritage in a display case (rather than in it's homeland), if the information isn't going to be shared? But of course, many people "abused" antiques, so that can be debatable. Hopefully the original owner (Datu's family?) was more than compensated for the barong... but I doubt it  
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				
				
				
					Posts: 1,020
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			For something that had a broken kakatua it sure went for a lot.  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	It might have been a bidding war, I didn't follow it. Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Oct 2008 
				Location: between work and sleep 
				
				
					Posts: 731
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2005 
				Location: USA Georgia 
				
				
					Posts: 1,599
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			More than I would have paid for it.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Nov 2006 
				Location: The Netherlands 
				
				
					Posts: 2,237
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Very nice barong. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Lovely inlay, but No way I would pay such an amount for a damaged piece without scabbard. Somebody (or probably a few people) must really have wanted this one. a remark on kukulza's comments : Quote: 
	
 But African ethnographic items are sold for big $$$.$$$ at autions in Europe. And than I really mean 100.000's USD  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |