![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 96
|
G'day,
I thought this may be of WWII vintage? or maybe earlier? Blade:17 1/2 in Handle: 6 3/8 in Spine: 7 mm then gradual distal taper to tip. It seems quite decently made to me. Cheers Dan |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 96
|
These marks look like stamps, spring stamps?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
Daniel,
It's not my field but it looks to me as a nice talibon. Like Kai said in the thread of the Barong to etch it, I would think to do it with this one too. This blade could also be laminated. I'm sure the more knowledgeable members will jump in. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Quote:
I am not pretending to have any knowledge of these weapons, but it seems to me that the barely visible markings look European. Old re-formed blade? If this is the case, would you still expect it to be laminated? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
Quote:
I don't think so if the blade is European. I thought to see something on one of the pictures. But as I said, this is not my field. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,345
|
I would be surprised if it were laminiated - this looks like it is spring mono-steel. Nice hilt carving for WWII - I do agree that it is probably WWII. Even if it were older, not all talibon were laminated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 96
|
To be clear,
I have lemon etched both pieces. Sorry, I thought this was visible. Thanks for all thoughts on both pieces so far. I look forward to learning more. Cheers Dan |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|