![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: May 2007 
				Location: J a k a r t a 
				
				
					Posts: 991
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 This is just one example, on mendhak. The left side, is mendhak type of "kendhit" (Jogjanese), and the right side, "kendhit" type of Solonese. There are only slight differences on the details of the mendhak (Please look at the neck of the mendhak)... These are types of mendhak "kendhit" inten seling mirah (simple diamond and mirah?) I hope it will be useful to you... Ganjawulung  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Aug 2006 
				
				
				
					Posts: 285
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 I've call our dear friend Mr Jumanto to provide some jogjanese silver mendak.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: May 2007 
				Location: J a k a r t a 
				
				
					Posts: 991
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			And these are examples on "robyong" type (pile types). From left to right, (1) Jogjanese "robyong", similar to "segara muncar" (sea wave?) of Solonese. (2) Jogjanese robyong with "inten" (simple diamonds), and (3) Solonese "bejen" type. 
		
		
		
			I hope I was not mistaken with my simple understanding on mendhaks.. Ganjawulung  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 Keris forum moderator 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Aug 2006 
				Location: Nova Scotia 
				
				
					Posts: 7,250
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Great thread subject Ganja. I would like to encourage you to post more comparison examples along this vein.   
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jun 2007 
				
				
				
					Posts: 401
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Pak Ganja, apart from the stones used for the deco, what is actually the difference between Solo & Jogja mendaks? I still cant tell the difference...
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | ||
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: May 2007 
				Location: J a k a r t a 
				
				
					Posts: 991
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 These were just simple examples... Quote: 
	
 Ganjawulung  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				
				
				
					Posts: 103
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Oh, well... I'm afraid we would repeat some past discussion.. 
		
		
		
			http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...7004#post47004 According to my understanding, the most notable different features of Jogja's and Solo's mendhak is their 'ungkat-ungkatan'. Solo's has a thin, skinny ungkat-ungkat, and Jogja's has a cone-shape ungkat-ungkat. As a picture worth more than a thousand words, I attach some pictures which had been posted before, with some comments added. I apologize for 'copyright infringement', if any, and also to Mas Ganjawulung. To Mas Ferry, you could find a fair/good new mendhak easily, usually the better one come in silver and yakut, but the old, good one (I mean, the better then the best new one could available), unfortunately, quite rare today. Finding the right 'proportion' on ukiran (handle), mendhak, wrangka and pendhok is very tricky. Size, shapes, color, textures and balance/harmony have come into account. You must have several good stock of handles, mendhaks and pendhoks to make proper adjustment. And the utmost is, you must have 'the feeling' to judge the proper harmony. It is the most important part, and unfortunately, that money can't buy. It is also not easy to learn.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#8 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: May 2007 
				Location: J a k a r t a 
				
				
					Posts: 991
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 I would post the other (Jogja) mendhaks. Do you think the second one is another style of Jogja kendhit? Ganjawulung  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#9 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				
				
				
					Posts: 103
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Yes, Mas Ganja. All the mendhak's pictures on your latest post are Jogjas, IMHO. The one with gems is kendhit. It use filigree in spite of ordinary meniran/beads. Just a variation, I think. Kendhit means belt, belted with gems, in this case, and the one with metal ball called mendhak lugas. Lugas simply means 'plain'. The kendhit is not necessarily better than lugas. With a good balance and execution, the lugas frequently beat the ordinary kendhit, in term of beauty, not money, of course  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			![]() Please bear in mind, while the 'lugas' and 'kendhit' are the proper terminology to define the mendhak's type especially in the court's circle, it might be unrecognized by some local seller. You might use 'polos' instead of 'lugas' (means the same, 'plain') or with/without mata (='eyes', the gems). 'robyong' is recognizable for three tier mendhak (might also in use with dhapurs, ex. sinom robyong). Last edited by Boedhi Adhitya; 30th November 2007 at 07:05 AM.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#10 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Oct 2011 
				
				
				
					Posts: 54
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Need to be identified below mendhak, what type of this mendhak? 
		
		
		
			Thanks..  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |