![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,259
|
Acquired this recently, described as a Luristan bronze sword. It has a grip with a face on the pommel and on the bolster. Fairly thin, prominant raised central rib, not sharp.
I suspect it may not be original, but i'd like confirmation one way or another. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: musorian territory
Posts: 474
|
id say that's a fake one for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 967
|
I will flip through a few books I have and see if I find any similar forms - it doesn't bring up any memories. The patina can provide some clues: pale green and "powdery" is suspicious; darker green and crystalline supports hopefulness.
Here is the surface of a 3000 year old Luristan bronze dagger that clearly has seen some cleaning: |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,259
|
The sword seems to have a mix of colours, the grip is mostly a worn shiny black, especially on the side opposite the faces. Parts of the blade you can see the bronze colour under the start of a shined brownish oxidation, there are ares that look like chrome polish was used to clean it, white residue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,259
|
More photos:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,259
|
More More:
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|