![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
For your comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 428
|
I don't know for the blade, but the hilt and scabbard is recent for me.
I find that the scabbard lacks finesse in its proportions compared to the antique specimens. ![]() But I find the hilt pleasant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
Quote:
Not sure. This was one of my earliest acquisitions and I very much over cleaned it! I have learned not to do this. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,250
|
I am of the mind that you can't over-clean silver and gold. These metals were never meant to be dull or tarnished on an ensemble IMHO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,345
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,376
|
White gold gets a nice subdued patina through being worn though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
Hello Jose,
Quote:
Actually, decent bronze is much easier to keep shiny than silver. Early bronze was originally utilized for jewellery (obviously as a replacement for gold) and only later for tools. I'd also assume that even brass was meant to be polished. However, I do agree that it is fairly futile to keep this alloy shiny - even with gentle cleaning most ethnographic pieces will loose too much metal for long-term preservation. Regards, Kai |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|