|  | 
|  | 
|  13th November 2006, 11:11 PM | #1 | 
| Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada 
					Posts: 1,242
				 |  Yataghan or bayonet? 
			
			Hello, I wanted to bid on this yataghan but the seller ended the listing early: http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?...0447&rd=1&rd=1 It has a yataghan hilt, some sort of European cross-guard and a yataghan blade with a fuller that makes it look like the French Chassepot bayonet. Any ideas as to its origin? Emanuel | 
|   |   | 
|  13th November 2006, 11:21 PM | #2 | 
| Vikingsword Staff Join Date: Nov 2004 
					Posts: 6,376
				 |   
			
			Looks like a rehilted bayonet.
		 | 
|   |   | 
|  14th November 2006, 01:37 AM | #3 | 
| Vikingsword Staff Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Aussie Bush 
					Posts: 4,513
				 |  Looks like a rehilted bayonet 
			
			Hi Manolo: I agree with Rick -- probably a rehilted bayonet. When I saw your sword my first thought was the British P1856/1858 bayonet with the "button" finials on the guard. Although close, your blade has a T-spine, the fuller on your blade is wrong, and your sword seems to have a wider and less tapering blade than the British P1856 bayonet. Unfortunately my bayonet references are buried deep in my study and I can't access them easily -- not a current passion.  But I will keep looking. In the meanwhile, here is a picture of a British P1856: http://arms2armor.com/Bayonets/brit1856.htm Ian. | 
|   |   | 
|  14th November 2006, 03:09 AM | #4 | 
| Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada 
					Posts: 1,242
				 |   
			
			Rick, Ian, I thank you both. You confirm my thoughts of a bayonet. I was unaware of the British patterns however, and only knew the French ones  . It seems many countries adopted this yataghan-type blade. Thanks for the link Ian, it's quite helpful...I'll start my own research into these bayonets as well, they're damn beautiful I think. Now why would anyone rehilt these in yataghan fashion? Was this a common practice at some point, or is it just to deceive unweary buyers? Regards, Emanuel | 
|   |   | 
|  14th November 2006, 03:46 AM | #5 | 
| Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Bay Area 
					Posts: 1,724
				 |   
			
			Could it be a Martini-Henry M1871 bayonet? The Ottomans were armed with this model during the Russo-Turkish War of 1877-78. I could not find a good picture of this bayonet and hopefully DD can help. What I can say with certainty is that it is neither a Chassepot, nor a Snider bayonet, nor a bayonet for the 1874 Martini-Peabody rifle.
		 | 
|   |   | 
|  14th November 2006, 04:43 AM | #6 | |
| Vikingsword Staff Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Aussie Bush 
					Posts: 4,513
				 |   
			
			Michael: AKAIK the only Martini bayonet that had a recurved "yataghan" style blade is P1860, which seems to be a direct descendant of the P1856/P1858 that I mentioned above. The P1860 was certainly adapted for use on the Martini-Henry Mk I M1871. Again, the same features that I mentioned above for the P1856/P1858 are different from Manolo's sword. There is a nice web site on Martini bayonets here: http://www.martinihenry.com/bayonets.htm ian. Quote: 
 | |
|   |   | 
|  | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
| 
 | 
 |