![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,417
|
Hello dear members,
want to share this unusual badik/badek (there are a lot of other names used for this type of dagger) from Java which crossed my way lately. The unsualness is the quiz for you! I think it's a difficult quiz, I am curious if someone will be able to solve it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,085
|
What is the question?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,417
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,085
|
To my eye, nothing at all, it conforms to type.
I've seen more than a few of these, they all vary slightly, but overall form is the same. Here is one I have, it was bought in Australia during the 1920's, but supposedly came from Malang in East Jawa during the period 1850-1900. My info from Jawa during 1980's is that it is North Coast Jawa. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,417
|
Yes, when I first saw it by pictures I also don't understand. Like you say, it conforms to type. But it's very small, see it here with two normal sized examples from the same general type.
Any guess why/for which reason? Child size? Jimat? Regards, Detlef |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,417
|
Inside scabbard 22 cm, 18 cm without and a blade from 11,2 cm.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|