|  | 
|  | 
|  5th February 2016, 01:18 PM | #1 | 
| Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: USA 
					Posts: 1,492
				 |  Long yatagan 
			
			I was wondering if this yatagan was a typical type that I have not seen before or just an an anomaly. It is really a sword and not a short sword, the cutting edge is 34 inches and the total length is 40 inches, it has a very concave, Turkish ribbon blade with a T handle. For size comparison I have shown it next to another yatagan with a 24 inch cutting edge and a total length of 31 inches. Has anyone seen another yatagan of the same shape and size.
		 | 
|   |   | 
|  5th February 2016, 02:26 PM | #2 | 
| Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Russia 
					Posts: 1,042
				 |   
			
			This is a fairly well-known type of yataghan.
		 Last edited by mahratt; 5th February 2016 at 02:39 PM. | 
|   |   | 
|  5th February 2016, 03:26 PM | #3 | 
| Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada 
					Posts: 1,242
				 |   
			
			Hi Eric, These big ones are associated with the Zeybeks. Have a look at this thread: 3 large yataghan (T-spine, T-pommel, Turkish Ribbon) and this one Zeibek Yataghan with T-shaped pommelI love the Turkish ribbon pattern on these. Emanuel | 
|   |   | 
|  5th February 2016, 05:19 PM | #4 | 
| Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Bay Area 
					Posts: 1,724
				 |   
			
			Nice yataghan. I have noticed that yataghans from Asia Minor tend to be longer in general.
		 | 
|   |   | 
|  5th February 2016, 06:24 PM | #5 | 
| Member Join Date: Jun 2013 
					Posts: 2,145
				 |   
			
			They are also called Bashi Bouzouk or Bashi Bouzouk. Mercenaries and warriors It,s also the favourite insult of captain Haddock in Tintin... | 
|   |   | 
|  6th February 2016, 01:23 AM | #6 | 
| Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: USA 
					Posts: 1,492
				 |   
			
			Thanks for the replies, while I have seen most of the old photos posted and a few similar T handled examples, what I was really looking for was to see one with a similar measurement. In the old photos you get an idea of length but no real details and the T handled one from Artzi has the same shape but it is obviously smaller.  I think a 40 inch/106.6cm sword is very long especially when not meant for mounted use. I am 6ft+ and have a long reach, this sword still seems unwieldy. The Zeybeck/Zeibek or Bashi Bouzouk/Bashi Bouzouk in the photos do not look very tall, what I was really interested in is the upper limit to the size of yatagan, I would like to verify that there are others of this size or was this just made extra long for a very tall Turk. Below are various types of swords showing the size differences. | 
|   |   | 
|  | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
| 
 | 
 |