In my earliest days of collecting, one of my key references, and my ideal, was Richard Burton and my now tattered copy of his "Book of the Sword" (1884). His comprehensive study of the ethnographic and historical arms of ancient times I think reflect many of the Victorian notions comparing the influences of the swords of ancient times to modern ethnographic forms.
The interesting shapes and styling of many ethnographic examples in many cases can be visually compared to these ancient forms as seen in instances of various iconography, but no direct lineage chronologically is proven in these cases, as compelling as they may be. It seems more potentially atavistic adaptions recognizing ancient traditions.
While a brilliant scholar and indeed swordsman, Burton did have his Anglo-centric posture on things and some of his notions did reflect what Christopher Spring ("African Arms & Armor") referred to as 'western pragmatism'. This went to the case of the African 'throwing knives' and in the same perspective the idea of the 'reaching around shields' pertaining to the Ethiopian shotels.
In fact, the 'throwing knives' in some cases were indeed thrown, however in the broader spectrum, with African arms as discussed, often it was a matter of elaborate design which was in a sense, 'for show'. These were in my opinion used in certain events and perhaps even confrontations as a kind of bearing weapon, and not intended for actual combat.
It is truly a great thing to have this kind of discussion and sharing of observations, which really helps in not only offering some most helpful insights for the owner of this sword, but for those of us hoping to learn more on these arms. I just wanted to thank Jeff for posting this and everyone who have shared so much information.
Changdao, very well put regarding the interpretation of the use of many ethnographic forms as applied in terms of western use techniques, and deeming them ineffective through misundertanding.
All best regards
Jim
|