I don't know what we can learn based on the 2 new kukri I posted in my last messages.
I suppose we can determine it probably is not a mismatch after all.
It is however very strange that the scabbard is so much oversized: It's complicated to understand why they put so much effort into making a nice scabbard and so little effort into sizing the scabbard correctly.
Based on the new evidence are all the kukri I posted of the same period? Is the estimated period still second quarter of the 20th century?
Are the kukri genuine/ antique/ usable kukri's or does the fact that I found 4 similar examples mean they should be regarded as tourist kukri's?
|