| 
				  
 
			
			Marius,See Rawson’s pics of Madras swords in the V&A museum. Also, chapter 8 in Elgood. They do look “spear-y”, but they are constructed in a manner of Tatar-Circassian sabers: bayonnet-like tip and the rest is for slashing.  See Pant, vol.2: there was a special name for such swords in Sanskrit, shulagra, i. e. Spear- pointed sword.
 
 The  tip of the blade is sharp on both edges usable for cutting,  and below it there is a perfect double-edged blade fully suitable for classical cutting. Tips of the sword blades were not used for real cutting: see Turkish Palas with a sign 8-10” inches  off the tip, indicating the desired point of impact.
 The blade is almost 27”; I have several Tulwar/pulwars with blades of such length and shorter.
 
 But let’s assume for a moment that you are correct, and the blade is from a spear. Still, it is not a recent marriage: patination is old, including the rivets.
 
 
 Kronckew is right: weapons were expensive and every usable part was “...fixed, recycled, rehilted, reshaped, resharpened, rebladed, repurposed, repaired ...until there was nothing left.”
 
 I would love it to be like that.
 
				 Last edited by ariel; 5th November 2019 at 02:03 AM.
 |