Marius, 
 See Rawson’s pics of Madras swords in the V&A museum. Also, chapter 8 in Elgood. They do look “spear-y”, but they are constructed in a manner of Tatar-Circassian sabers: bayonnet-like tip and the rest is for slashing.  See Pant, vol.2: there was a special name for such swords in Sanskrit, shulagra, i. e. Spear- pointed sword. 
 
 The  tip of the blade is sharp on both edges usable for cutting,  and below it there is a perfect double-edged blade fully suitable for classical cutting. Tips of the sword blades were not used for real cutting: see Turkish Palas with a sign 8-10” inches  off the tip, indicating the desired point of impact.  
The blade is almost 27”; I have several Tulwar/pulwars with blades of such length and shorter.  
 
But let’s assume for a moment that you are correct, and the blade is from a spear. Still, it is not a recent marriage: patination is old, including the rivets.  
 
 
Kronckew is right: weapons were expensive and every usable part was “...fixed, recycled, rehilted, reshaped, resharpened, rebladed, repurposed, repaired ...until there was nothing left.” 
 
I would love it to be like that.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				  
				
					
						Last edited by ariel; 5th November 2019 at 03:03 AM.
					
					
				
			
		
		
	 |