Both Kubur and Detlef think that the knife shown in post #6 is both much better and much older than the knives shown in the other posts.
I find this very interesting.
In respect of age, I cannot guess how old the post #6 knife is, so I am prepared to accept it might be older than the other knives.
However, what interests me is that two very experienced people should have formed the opinion that the post #6 knife is much better than the other knives shown.
I might be missing something here, but I simply cannot see that.
I have taken the word "better" to mean that the quality of craftsmanship, and the overall condition of the post #6 knife are better than the other knives shown.
Really?
I would very much appreciate a clear objective explanation as to exactly what characteristics of the post #6 knife make it better than the other knives shown.
|