Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Spunjer
excellent question, Ian. Based on Cato's classification, I'm with you on the blade style that of Maranao origin.
with that said, i would like to add this: a lot of pandays travel from town to town. this has always been the custom from time immemorial. so if a Maranao panday travels to Sulu and decided to stay there for awhile, would his blade be considered Maranao even tho it was commissioned by a Tausug?
|
Ron, we could take this further and perhaps with a clearer answer. If a Japanese swordsmith created a
katana in, say, Thailand, would it still be a Japanese
katana or would it be a version of a Thai
daab? The sword would be indistinguishable from those he created in Japan, so how would one distinguish where it was made? The answer, clearly, is the
katana is a
katana wherever it is manufactured.
I would therefore say that if a Maranao craftsman created a Maranao
kris in, say, Tawi Tawi, it would still be a Maranao
kris because the nature of the
kris is imbued by its creator and not by its place of manufacture.
To take this in a different direction. If a Maranao craftsman created a
kris blade in the Maranao homeland and traded that blade to a Tausug in Jolo who then dressed it in traditional Sulu fashion, does that
kris then become a Tausug
kris or is it still a Maranao
kris? Is it the blade or its hilt/scabbard that is the essential determinant of the culture to which this sword belongs? Or does it come down to whoever owns the sword and the culture/ethnic group in which it is being used?
I don't wish to hijack Lee's thread with these philosophical thoughts, so perhaps someone could start a new thread where these questions can be pursued in a more general way. I'm sure there are plenty of other examples from elsewhere that could be drawn into such a discussion. Charles has shown us a number of his cross-cultural pieces in the past that would be good subjects for this discussion.
Ian.