Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ariel
The confusion about this term is not unique.
After all, Ottoman implies Turkish Royal dynasty. It was in control for ~ 700 years and ruled over tribes of different ethnic and geographical origins.
In this sense it is not much different from our usage of Qajar swords, Ming vases or Tzarist Russian Shashkas. All objects from these groups could have been made in different times and different localities. Napoleonic swords are even more ambiguous: we imply era, but lump together French, German and British swords. Luckily, for them we have readable inscriptions and well-known patterns; those are as a rule unavailable on Ottoman weapons.
To sum up, we use the term "Ottoman" not because it is the best one, but simply because there is no more precise attribution.
|
I agree also and to sum up:
Is it the chicken who invented the egg or the egg who invented the chicken?